Dictionary:
User talk:Connel MacKenzie/archive-2006-06noun
|T]] C 17:36, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
::Could you also disregard all postpositions, affixes and other non-English parts of speech? — [[User talk:Vildricianus
|Vildricianus]] 17:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
If third level heading contains one of these:
abbreviation
acronym
adjective
antonym
article
brivla
cmavo
cmene
contraction
correlative
exclamation
expression
fu'ivla
gismu
idiom
initialism
interjection
letter
lujvo
noun
number
numeral
phrase
prefix
preposition
proverb
romaji
suffix
symbol
transitive
verb
then I exclude it. Which of these are incorrect? Which should be added? (Comments from the peanut gallery, not only Vildricianus, are appreciated here.) --Connel MacKenzie [[User talk:Connel MacKenzie
|T]] C 17:50, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
:That I can think of now: infix, affix and postposition.
:Also, which list is that? I mean, 3rd level headers in any entry? Then you're missing quite some more. Or is there a first criterion met before you check for these? In other words, from which todo list is that? — [[User talk:Vildricianus
|Vildricianus]] 20:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
:: /todo3.
::Excluding strange unicode characters entries, yes, that is it. Those are the POS headings that I recognize. Of course there are a lot more third level headings, but I'm looking for definitions for entries. Now that the to-do lists are shrinking, I'm considering making the change that SemperBlotto asked for a long time ago - listing 'all' such sections that don't have a "
" line. Right now, if the any of these has a "
" line, then the entire entry is marked as "clean," until the list gets a bit smaller still, anyhow. --Connel MacKenzie [[User talk:Connel MacKenzie
|T]] C 21:05, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
:::Um, and "adverb"? But indeed, it looks like the todos are shrinking. The majority of entries are those insane Biblical Hebrew and Ancient Greek things, and other non-Latin script entries. — [[User talk:Vildricianus
|Vildricianus]] 21:18, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
:::: Adverbs get picked up as "verb"s somewhere along the way. :-) As pronouns get picked up as nouns. Probably lots more errors hidden away in there. But I kindof want to get this list (that used to be over 10,000) down farther before expanding the scope. Ooh, I did forget "conjunction". Anyway, last time I widened the scope, I got 27,000+ results. At the time, wikimedia refused to take pages quite that large (and I hadn't started subdividing them yet, back then.) --Connel MacKenzie [[User talk:Connel MacKenzie